# Amavis bayesien **URL:** \ **Category:** Programmation\ **Created:** [Février 21, 2016, 12:23 UTC](https://www.debian-fr.org/t/amavis-bayesien/29993 "2016-02-21T00:23:22Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 7\ **Page:** 1

**Author:** ![mccm](https://www.debian-fr.org/user_avatar/www.debian-fr.org/mccm/32/12242_2.png) [@mccm](https://www.debian-fr.org/u/mccm)\ **Post date:** [Février 21, 2016, 12:23 UTC](https://www.debian-fr.org/t/amavis-bayesien/29993/1 "2016-02-21T00:23:22Z")

Bonjour à tous, j’aimerai vérifier avec vous la bonne mise en place que m’a GW email surtout au niveau de l’apprentissage bayesien! voila le mikmak ma passerelle email vat chercher dans un dossier spam les emails du meme nom ainsi de des non spam! en suite je lui donne tout ça a manger. mais malheureusement je n’ai jamais vu passer un email taggué en spam grasse a mon bayesien chérie 😉 voici mon script. merci pour vos retours [code]#!/bin/bash ################################################# # Mise a jour de la base anti spam ################################################# date="$(date +"%Y%m%d")“ heur=”$(date +"%T")" LOG=/var/log/ exec \> $LOG/sa-learn-$date.log 2\>&1 PATH\_SPAM=/root/admin/sa-learn/spam PATH\_NOSPAM=/root/admin/sa-learn/nospam PATH\_BACKUP=/root/admin/sa-learn/backup/ NOM\_BACKUP=bayes-$date-$heur.bck # backup de la base bayes echo -e "## backup de la base bayes $PATH\_BACKUP$NOM\_BACKUP" chown -R amavis:amavis $PATH\_BACKUP su amavis -c ‘sa-learn --backup’ \> $PATH\_BACKUP$NOM\_BACKUP # Copie des emails en local echo -e "## copie des spams" scp -v root@srv\_mail:/home/vbox/mon.domaine/spam/.spam/cur/\* $PATH\_SPAM echo -e "## copie des nospams" scp -v root@srv\_mail:/home/vbox/mon.domaine/spam/.nospam/cur/\* $PATH\_NOSPAM # Changement des permissions pour le sa-learn chown -R amavis:amavis $PATH\_SPAM chown -R amavis:amavis $PATH\_NOSPAM # on deplace les email ds la boite old echo -e "## Deplacement des email ds dossier old" ssh root@srv\_mail 'bash -c “mv /home/vbox/mon.domaine/spam/.spam/cur/\* /home/vbox/mon.domaine/spam/.old\_spam/cur/”' ssh root@srv\_mail ‘bash -c “mv /home/vbox/mon.domaine/spam/.nospam/cur/\* /home/vbox/mon.domaine/spam/.old\_nospam/cur/”’ # affiche les stats echo -e "# STATS" su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic’ echo -e “#” # on donne a manger a spamassassin su amavis -c 'sa-learn --no-sync -D --spam --dir /root/admin/sa-learn/spam/' su amavis -c 'sa-learn --no-sync -D --ham --dir /root/admin/sa-learn/nospam/' su amavis -c ‘sa-learn --sync’ # affiche les stats echo -e "# STATS" su amavis -c 'sa-learn --dump magic’ echo -e “#” # archivage des emails mv /root/admin/sa-learn/spam/\* /root/admin/sa-learn/old\_spam/ mv /root/admin/sa-learn/nospam/\* /root/admin/sa-learn/old\_nospam/ echo -e “# FIN”[/code] ---

**Author:** ![lol](https://www.debian-fr.org/user_avatar/www.debian-fr.org/lol/32/15629_2.png) [@lol](https://www.debian-fr.org/u/lol)\ **Post date:** [Février 21, 2016, 12:23 UTC](https://www.debian-fr.org/t/amavis-bayesien/29993/2 "2016-02-21T00:23:24Z")

Salut j’ai déplacé de T&A à Programmation (script). Modo, si tu juges que c’est mieux dans support n’hésite pas. 😉 ---

**Author:** ![fran.b](https://www.debian-fr.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/f/d78d45/32.png) [@fran.b](https://www.debian-fr.org/u/fran.b)\ **Post date:** [Février 21, 2016, 12:23 UTC](https://www.debian-fr.org/t/amavis-bayesien/29993/3 "2016-02-21T00:23:27Z")

Le filtre bayesien ne fonctionne qu’à partir de plusieurs milliers de messages analysés, avant spamassassin laisse tout passer. ---

a partir de 1000 c’est bien ça? et a quoi correspond le su amavis -c ‘sa-learn --dump magic’ ? `0.000 0 3 0 non-token data: bayes db version 0.000 0 206717 0 non-token data: nspam 0.000 0 139179 0 non-token data: nham 0.000 0 203820 0 non-token data: ntokens 0.000 0 1293084864 0 non-token data: oldest atime 0.000 0 1293462858 0 non-token data: newest atime 0.000 0 1293462860 0 non-token data: last journal sync atime 0.000 0 1293427513 0 non-token data: last expiry atime 0.000 0 169886 0 non-token data: last expire atime delta 0.000 0 19731 0 non-token data: last expire reduction count` ---

Au fait que tu as beaucoup de mails analysés et que ça devrait marcher. Tu as fait un test `$ su amavis $ spamc -t 60 < Exemple_de_mail_avec_entetes_et_tout | less` ---

alors 😉 [code] spamc -t 60 \< [1293442441.M190811P628.mon.domain.fr](http://1293442441.M190811P628.mon.domain.fr),S=8807,W=8939:2,a Return-Path: [1891590z8455@bounce.express-fax.fr](mailto:1891590z8455@bounce.express-fax.fr) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) X-Spam-Level: \*\*\* X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML\_IMAGE\_RATIO\_04, HTML\_MESSAGE,MIME\_HTML\_ONLY autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Original-To: [email@mondomaine.fr](mailto:email@mondomaine.fr) Delivered-To: [email@mondomaine.fr](mailto:email@mondomaine.fr) Received: from [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) ([srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) [x.x.x.x]) by [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2496E04E; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:20:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFEE43A4BC; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:28:25 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) Received: from [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost ([srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HANCZCL5CXhC; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:28:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9D4BF43A958; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:28:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [mx10.express-fax.fr](http://mx10.express-fax.fr) ([mx10.express-fax.fr](http://mx10.express-fax.fr) [195.43.150.217]) by [srv.mondomaine.fr](http://srv.mondomaine.fr) (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709A543A4BC for [email@mondomaine.fr](mailto:email@mondomaine.fr); Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:28:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by [mx10.express-fax.fr](http://mx10.express-fax.fr) (Postfix, from userid 0) id 9D587D6D3FF; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:54:08 +0100 (CET) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:54:08 +0100 From: Alfred DUPONT [alfred-dupont-@express-train.ru](mailto:alfred-dupont-@express-train.ru) To: [email@mondomaine.fr](mailto:email@mondomaine.fr) Subject: Calendriers Gestion de Projets 2011 pour votre entreprise Errors-To: [bounce@express-train.ru](mailto:bounce@express-train.ru) X-Feas-Surl: [http://mx10.express-fax.fr](http://mx10.express-fax.fr) Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1; X-Mailer: mx10expressfaxfr Message-Id: [20101224190858.9D587D6D3FF@mx10.express-fax.fr](mailto:20101224190858.9D587D6D3FF@mx10.express-fax.fr) PCFET0NUWVBFIEhUTUwgUFVCTElDICItLy9XM0MvL0RURCBIVE1MIDQuMDEgVHJhbnNpdGlvbmFs Ly9FTiIgImh0dHA6Ly93d3cudzNjLm9yZy9UUi8xOTk5L1JFQy1odG1sN+ [/code] avec un fichier test spam `Return-Path: dev_null_sample_spam@example.com X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on srv.mondomaine.fr X-Spam-Level: ******** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=8.6 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN,INVALID_DATE,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Report: =?ISO-8859-1?Q? * 1.7 INVALID_DATE L'en-t=eate Date: est incorrect (il contient AM/PM) * 2.5 DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN RBL: Envelope sender in dsn.rfc-ignorant.org * 1.8 DATE_IN_PAST_12_24 Date: est 12 =e0 24 heures avant la date de * l'en-t=eate Received: * 2.6 INVALID_MSGID Le Message-ID est invalide, selon la RFC-2822?= Delivery-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:36:25 +0000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev_null_sample_spam@netnoteinc.com Received: from dogma.slashnull.org (dogma.slashnull.org [212.17.35.15]) by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F138F114121 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:36:21 +0000 (Eire) Received: (from dev_null_sample_spam@localhost) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA17343 for dev_null_sample_spam@netnoteinc.com; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:36:21 GMT Received: from XeNT.ics.uci.edu (xent.ics.uci.edu [128.195.21.213]) by dogma.slashnull.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA17336 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:36:16 GMT From: xl6Ety00V@fismat1.fcfm.buap.mx Received: from blue.mydomain.com (blue.mydomain.com [208.184.130.52]) by XeNT.ics.uci.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA16254 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 04:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns.fundch.cl (unknown [200.28.105.254]) by blue.mydomain.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32333424F for ; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 20:33:02 -0500 (EST) X-Antispam: rblchk: (RSS) 3 Relayed through blacklisted site 200.28.105.254 Received: from y068k3017 [63.10.249.142] by ns.fundch.cl (SMTPD32-6.00) id A92614DC012A; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 22:21:26 -0400 DATE: 21 Jan 01 8:24:27 PM Message-ID: Subject: /!\ SPAM /!\ Home Based Business for Grownups To: undisclosed-recipients: ; Sender: dev_null_sample_spam@example.com X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Home Based Business for Grownups ` alors doc? [edit: J’ai viré le nom de Chloë et l’adresse email récupérable] ---

Le deuxième porte bien un drapeau «X-Spam-Flag: YES», c’est donc au niveau du traitement de ce drapeau que ça coince dans ta chaine de traitement. Les règles bayésiennes fonctionnent