Installation pilote nvidia probleme [resolu]

Support Debian
#10

/usr/bin/glxgears -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark

me donne

30778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6153.440 FPS 33754 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6750.758 FPS 34563 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6912.433 FPS 31843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6368.458 FPS 34739 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6947.785 FPS 34797 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6959.397 FPS 34799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6959.654 FPS 34788 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6957.532 FPS

donc sa marche ?!

#11

Tu es sûr de lire ttes les réponses ? :unamused:
Voilà ce que t’a écrit Ginkgo

C’est clair, non ? :smt093

#12

na mé je l’ai pas vu il a du poster en meme temps que moi ou alors je suis aveugle ^

par contre si vous avez un lien se serai bien car je l’ai que trouver en .exe ( grrr windows )

#13

c bon j’ai fait avec synaptic ( dsl j’ai po encore tt les reflex linux ) sinon bah il march bien j’ai 120 de fps c’est niquel il tourne bien :smiley:

#14

[quote=“d4n”]/usr/bin/glxgears -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark

me donne

30778 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6153.440 FPS 33754 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6750.758 FPS 34563 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6912.433 FPS 31843 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6368.458 FPS 34739 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6947.785 FPS 34797 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6959.397 FPS 34799 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6959.654 FPS 34788 frames in 5.0 seconds = 6957.532 FPS

donc sa marche ?![/quote]

j’ai +/- 2000 FPS :laughing:

#15

Dites, en suivant le fil il m’est venu à l’esprit que je n’avais jamais fait de glxinfo sur ma machine.
Je me suis aperçu que je tournais à ~40fps au mieux.
maintenant que j’ai ajouté mon user au gpe video, j’arrive à ~230fps avec une GeForce4 MX 440/AGP/SSE2
Je sais que c’est un peu ancien, mais comparé à vos débits, ça me parait quand même encore salement faiblard, non ?

#16

Oui, que te donnes
$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL

#17

[quote=“fran.b”]Oui, que te donnes
$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL[/quote]emeraude:~/qemu/kqemu/kqemu-1.3.0pre9$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation OpenGL renderer string: GeForce4 MX 440/AGP/SSE2 OpenGL version string: 1.5.6 NVIDIA 87.74 OpenGL extensions:

#18

Là c’est étrange, visiblement l’accélaration est là, moi j’ai

[quote]francois@totoche:~$ glxinfo | grep OpenGL
OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation
OpenGL renderer string: GeForce FX Go5200/AGP/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 2.0.2 NVIDIA 87.62
OpenGL extensions:
francois@totoche:~$
[/quote]
et j’obtiens un fps de 3200!!!

Ta carte devrait être plus puissante que la mienne or un fps de 230, c’est un fps de carte non accélérée… Tu arrives à jouer à tuxracer?

#19

bon, ben tuxracer est jouable, mais je me suis apercu que le fbdev n’etait pas activé.
Je modifies et je redémarres X

#20

pas franchement mieux.
voilà ce que ça donne en commenté:

[quote]emeraude:~/qemu/kqemu/kqemu-1.3.0pre9$ /usr/bin/glxgears -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark
7 frames in 5.3 seconds = 1.333 FPS <- ici, c’est le démarrage de ma session kde pas encore finie.
8 frames in 6.1 seconds = 1.304 FPS
319 frames in 5.0 seconds = 63.774 FPS
536 frames in 5.0 seconds = 106.987 FPS
222 frames in 5.0 seconds = 44.255 FPS
2008 frames in 5.0 seconds = 401.468 FPS <- là, l’appli de front est la konsole sur laquelle je suis le décompte
2284 frames in 5.0 seconds = 456.792 FPS
2273 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.600 FPS
2323 frames in 5.0 seconds = 464.598 FPS
2260 frames in 5.0 seconds = 451.994 FPS
2146 frames in 5.0 seconds = 429.035 FPS
2268 frames in 5.0 seconds = 453.409 FPS
2265 frames in 5.0 seconds = 452.990 FPS
2169 frames in 5.0 seconds = 433.794 FPS
2309 frames in 5.0 seconds = 461.774 FPS
1998 frames in 5.0 seconds = 399.600 FPS <- là, je passes la fenètre de rouages au premier plan (elle était masquée)
1471 frames in 5.0 seconds = 293.836 FPS
1630 frames in 5.0 seconds = 325.595 FPS
1179 frames in 5.0 seconds = 235.632 FPS
1174 frames in 5.0 seconds = 234.800 FPS
1170 frames in 5.0 seconds = 233.691 FPS
1825 frames in 5.0 seconds = 364.893 FPS
2272 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.387 FPS <- je l’iconifie
2270 frames in 5.0 seconds = 453.978 FPS
2276 frames in 5.0 seconds = 454.865 FPS
2250 frames in 5.0 seconds = 449.997 FPS
2141 frames in 5.0 seconds = 428.195 FPS
^C[/quote]

#21

:open_mouth: ppracer:[quote]emeraude:~/qemu/kqemu/kqemu-1.3.0pre9$ /usr/bin/glxgears -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark
1476 frames in 5.0 seconds = 295.024 FPS <-lancement simultané de ppracer
1394 frames in 5.0 seconds = 278.599 FPS
1033 frames in 5.0 seconds = 206.493 FPS
558 frames in 5.0 seconds = 111.588 FPS
372 frames in 6.9 seconds = 53.702 FPS
407 frames in 5.0 seconds = 81.258 FPS
311 frames in 5.0 seconds = 61.651 FPS
252 frames in 5.0 seconds = 50.137 FPS
312 frames in 5.0 seconds = 62.366 FPS
202 frames in 5.0 seconds = 40.228 FPS
259 frames in 5.0 seconds = 51.400 FPS
174 frames in 5.0 seconds = 34.618 FPS
167 frames in 5.0 seconds = 33.353 FPS
140 frames in 5.1 seconds = 27.451 FPS
160 frames in 5.0 seconds = 31.862 FPS
158 frames in 5.0 seconds = 31.547 FPS
224 frames in 5.0 seconds = 44.796 FPS
231 frames in 5.0 seconds = 45.921 FPS
229 frames in 5.0 seconds = 45.721 FPS
1075 frames in 5.0 seconds = 214.954 FPS <-sortie de ppracer
2215 frames in 5.0 seconds = 442.993 FPS
2235 frames in 5.0 seconds = 446.989 FPS
[/quote]

#22

Vraiment pas terrible:

[quote]francois@totoche:~$ glxgears (un autre est déjà lancé)
2785 frames in 5.0 seconds = 557.000 FPS
4855 frames in 5.0 seconds = 971.000 FPS
3571 frames in 5.0 seconds = 714.200 FPS
3748 frames in 5.0 seconds = 749.600 FPS
4752 frames in 5.0 seconds = 950.400 FPS
4253 frames in 5.0 seconds = 850.600 FPS
5366 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1073.200 FPS
6152 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1230.400 FPS

je tue le premier lancé

18312 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3662.400 FPS
16834 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3366.800 FPS

je minimise la fenêtre

23989 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4797.800 FPS
29721 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5944.200 FPS
28039 frames in 5.0 seconds = 5607.800 FPS
22482 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4496.400 FPS

normal

14733 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2946.600 FPS

je la rapetisse

55620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 11124.000 FPS
53813 frames in 5.0 seconds = 10762.600 FPS

je la rapetisse encore…

37815 frames in 5.0 seconds = 7563.000 FPS
47096 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9419.200 FPS
47979 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9595.800 FPS
46772 frames in 5.0 seconds = 9354.400 FPS

[/quote]

#23

matt quelles sont tes options dans xorg? (je sais pas si ca a grand chose à voir mais moi j’ai un render accel à “true” sur les options de la carte

edit: pfff moi aussi je tourne à 600fps!! ca crains du boudin

#24

l’option render accel fait considérablement chutter les résultats en revanche

Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "bitmap" Load "ddc" Load "extmod" Load "freetype" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "int10" Load "type1" Load "vbe"

load dbe améliore les choses.

#25

en tatonnant plein d’autres options, rien à faire, je plafonnais à 230 fps, alors j’ai recompilé un 2.6.18-1 avec ma config habituelle (il fallait que je le fasse) et voilà le résultat:

emeraude:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18$ /usr/bin/glxgears -iacknowledgethatthistoolisnotabenchmark 725 frames in 5.0 seconds = 144.904 FPS 936 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.053 FPS 917 frames in 5.0 seconds = 183.291 FPS 937 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.360 FPS 937 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.355 FPS 937 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.216 FPS 938 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.523 FPS 938 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.487 FPS 1132 frames in 5.0 seconds = 226.218 FPS 937 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.165 FPS 942 frames in 5.0 seconds = 188.336 FPS 935 frames in 5.0 seconds = 186.997 FPS 932 frames in 5.0 seconds = 186.215 FPS 933 frames in 5.0 seconds = 186.562 FPS 912 frames in 5.0 seconds = 182.399 FPS 936 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.197 FPS 935 frames in 5.0 seconds = 186.889 FPS 940 frames in 5.0 seconds = 187.849 FPS 1184 frames in 5.0 seconds = 236.704 FPS je déséspère. :cry:

#26

vraiment bizarre, est ce que l’AGP est actif? Y-a-t-il des warnings lors du chargement du module NVIDIA?

#27

[quote=“fran.b”]vraiment bizarre, est ce que l’AGP est actif?[/quote]Comment tu sais ça ?
J’ai essayé, dans xorg.conf, de mettre une “option nvagp” en testant toutes les possiblités, mais ça n’a rien changé. Rien de ce que j’ai touché dans xorg.conf, d’ailleurs, et pourtant, j’ai joué sur tous les paramètres que je trouvais. Voici ce que j’ai laissé:

[code]Section "Device"
Identifier "nVidia Corporation NV17 [GeForce4 MX 440]"
Driver "nvidia"
Option “UseFBDev” "true"
Option "NoLogo"
Option “Xinerama” "on"
Option “NvAGP” “3” #0 desactive, 1 - NVIDIA , 2 - AGPART, 3 - 2 si possible sinon 1

Option “RenderAccel” “true” # experimental, default: “false”

Option “NoRenderExtension” “true” # pour le 8 bits, default “false”

Option “UBB” “false” # gpu quadro, default “true”

Option “WindowFlip” “true” # si UBB, ameliore la 3D, default “false”

Option “PageFlip” “false” # default “true”

Option “DigitalVibrance” “0” # defaut 0

Option “Dac8Bit” “true” # pour quadro, default “false”

Option “Overlay” “true” # pour quadro, restreint, default “false”

Option “CIOverlay” “true” # pour quadro, restreint, default “false”

Option “TransparentIndex” “0” # depend de Overlay, default “0”

Option “OverlayDefaultVisual” “true” # idem default “false”

Option “SWCursor” “true” # default “false”

Option “HWCursor” “false” # default “true”

Option “CursorShadow” “true” # gf2 et plus, default “false”

Option “CursorShadowAlpha” “64” # default “64”

Option “CursorShadowXOffset” “4” # default “4”

Option “CursorShadowYOffset” “2” # default “2”

Option “NoBandWidthTest” “true” # default “false”

Option “IgnoreDisplayDevices” “” # TV|CRT|DFP, si X est lent au demarrage

Option “MultisampleCompatibility” “false”

    Option  "UseEdidFreqs"                  "true"  # pour demander les plages de sync au moniteur

Option “IgnoreEDID” “true” # default “false”

Option “NoDDC” “true” # Synonyme de “IgnoreEDID”

Option “FlatPanelProperties” “Scaling = centered, Dithering = enabled” # Scaling =[default,native,scaled,center,asp

ect-scaled], dither=[default,enabled,disabled]

Option “UseInt10Module” “true” # pour utiliser XFree pour initialiser les ecrans, default “false”

Option “UseClipIDs” “true” # necessite quadro+UBB

Option “TwinView” “true” # activation du twinview, default false

Option “TwinViewOrientation” “RightOf” # [“RightOf”|“LeftOf”|“Above”|“Below”|“Clone”] default NULL

Option “ConnectedMonitor” “CRT,TV” # CRT: cathodique, DFP: Plat sur DVI, TV: tv

Option “SecondMonitorHorizSync” “30-50”

Option “SecondMonitorVertRefresh” “60”

Option “MetaModes” "1280x1024,720x576;1280x1024;1024x768,720x576;1024x768,NULL;640x480,720x576;640x480,

NULL;320x240,720x576;320x200,NULL"

Option “MetaModes” “1280x1024,NULL;1280x1024,800x600;1280x1024;320x200,NULL”

Option “NoTwinViewXineramaInfo” “true” # par default: false

Option “TVStandard” “PAL-N”

Option “TVOutFormat” “PAL-N”

Option “TVOverScan” “0.8” # Valeur decimale comprise entre 0.0 et 1.0, default 0

Option “Stereo” “0” # stereovision pour quadro

EndSection
[/code]Je m’aperçois que j’ai laissé le xinerama. Je vais le desactiver, tiens. [quote=“fran.b”] Y-a-t-il des warnings lors du chargement du module NVIDIA?[/quote]quote="/var/log/syslog"
Oct 15 09:34:20 localhost /USR/SBIN/CRON[3991]: (logcheck) CMD ( if [ -x /usr/sbin/logcheck ]; then nice -n10 /usr/sbin/logcheck -R;
fi)
Oct 15 09:34:24 localhost kernel: ip_tables: © 2000-2006 Netfilter Core Team
Oct 15 09:34:27 localhost kernel: nvidia: module license ‘NVIDIA’ taints kernel.
Oct 15 09:34:27 localhost kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:01:00.0[A] -> Link [LNKA] -> GSI 11 (level, low) -> IRQ 11
Oct 15 09:34:27 localhost kernel: NVRM: loading NVIDIA Linux x86 Kernel Module 1.0-8774 Tue Aug 1 20:54:08 PDT 2006
Oct 15 09:34:28 localhost kernel: agpgart: Found an AGP 2.0 compliant device at 0000:00:00.0.
Oct 15 09:34:28 localhost kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:00:00.0 into 4x mode
Oct 15 09:34:28 localhost kernel: agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 0000:01:00.0 into 4x mode
Oct 15 09:35:38 localhost gconfd (console-5219): démarrage (version 2.14.0), pid 5219 utilisateur « console »
(…)[/quote]Ben aucun warning ici.
et emeraude:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18$ grep "(WW)" /var/log/Xorg.0.log (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/cyrillic" does not exist. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" does not exist. (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/". (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/". (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/share/fonts/X11/Type1". (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1". (WW) The directory "/usr/share/fonts/X11/CID" does not exist. (WW) The directory "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID" does not exist. (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi". (WW) `fonts.dir' not found (or not valid) in "/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi". (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "1200x800"; removing. (WW) NVIDIA(0): No valid modes for "720x400"; removing. (WW) NVIDIA(0): No size information available in CRT-0's EDID; cannot compute (WW) NVIDIA(0): DPI from EDID. (WW) NVIDIA(0): Option "UseFBDev" is not used (WW) NVIDIA(0): Option "Xinerama" is not used

#28

[quote=“MattOTop”][quote=“fran.b”]vraiment bizarre, est ce que l’AGP est actif?[/quote]Comment tu sais ça ?
[/quote]
Dans dmesg

Linux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
agpgart: Detected an Intel(R) 865G, but could not find the secondary device. Ass
uming a non-integrated video card.
agpgart: Detected Intel(R) 865G chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000

Sinon pour la suite j’ai noté que

warning que je n’ai pas (mais j’ai XFree4.3)

J’ai aussi noté

Comme tu vois, j’ai que dalle sauf le nologo!

#29

[quote=“fran.b”][quote=“MattOTop”][quote=“fran.b”]vraiment bizarre, est ce que l’AGP est actif?[/quote]Comment tu sais ça ?[/quote]Dans dmesgLinux agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M agpgart: Detected an Intel(R) 865G, but could not find the secondary device. Ass uming a non-integrated video card. agpgart: Detected Intel(R) 865G chipset agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000[/quote]emeraude:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18$ lsmod | grep agp intel_agp 22172 1 agpgart 31052 2 nvidia,intel_agp emeraude:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.18$ grep agp /var/log/dmesg Linux agpgart interface v0.101 (c) Dave Jones agpgart: Detected an Intel i850 Chipset. agpgart: AGP aperture is 64M @ 0xe0000000Ben non, ça m’a l’air normal.[quote=“fran.b”]Sinon pour la suite j’ai noté quequote NVIDIA(0): Option “UseFBDev” is not used
(WW) NVIDIA(0): Option “Xinerama” is not used [/quote]
warning que je n’ai pas (mais j’ai XFree4.3)[/quote]je regardes ça.[quote=“fran.b”]J’ai aussi noté[quote] Option “NvAGP” “3” #0 desactive, 1 - NVIDIA , 2 - AGPART, 3 - 2 si possible sinon 1 [/quote]
Essaye à 1 puis à 2 pour voir…[/quote]Déjà fait…[quote=“fran.b”]Voilà mes options sinon:

[quote]Section “Device”
### Available Driver options are:-

sw_cursor is needed for some ati and radeon cards

Option “sw_cursor”
#Option “hw_cursor”
#Option “NoAccel”
#Option “ShowCache”
#Option “ShadowFB”
#Option “UseFBDev”
#Option "Rotate"
Identifier "Card0"
Driver "nvidia"
VendorName "All"
BoardName "All"
Option “NoLogo” “true”

BusID “PCI:1:0:0”

EndSection
[/quote]Comme tu vois, j’ai que dalle sauf le nologo![/quote]Ben vi.
Je reste bien ennuyé.